11 ms·
Of course they left the Wall Street Journal (paywalled and quite expensive) out of their list because it doesn't fit their narrative.
by kyleblarson 6y ago
Of course they left the Wall Street Journal (paywalled and quite expensive) out of their list because it doesn't fit their narrative.
- brendoelfrendo 6y agoAs in... the WSJ publishes lies but is paywalled? That's generally not my experience; WSJ is nowhere near where it used to be, but isn't among the trash tier of journalism, yet. The "media bias" chart from Ad Fontes media puts them at a slight right slant, with reporting accuracy more-or-less on par with publications like Newsweek, The Economist, and WaPo.[0][1] [0] Chart: https://www.adfontesmedia.com/gallery/ https://www.adfontesmedia.com/gallery/ [1] Methodology: https://www.adfontesmedia.com/how-ad-fontes-ranks-news-sources/ https://www.adfontesmedia.com/how-ad-fontes-ranks-news-sourc...
- kyleblarson 6y agoI was implying that the WSJ is generally conservative, and the only examples they give of free sites are (uber / crazy) conservative. I've subscribed to the WSJ for 15 years and read it daily. Their iPad app is beautiful.