3 ms·

I don't. These things are sad and immoral, on that we agree. However, government and legality should not be arbiters of human morality; it's a huge and ineffic

I don't. These things are sad and immoral, on that we agree. However, government and legality should not be arbiters of human morality; it's a huge and inefficient and stupid mechanism that should only be used to solved issues that absolutely cannot be solved without it and it's monopoly on violence. This kind of thing is better solved by society itself, and, judging by slowly, but steadily improving social norms, declining violence and improving human rights all around the globe, it is.

sukilot 6y ago
> government and legality should not be arbiters of human morality Then what is the point of having government and legality at all?
- balfirevic 6y ago
  > should only be used to solved issues that absolutely cannot be solved without it and it's monopoly on violence
appleiigs 6y ago
You guys can split the difference. Regulate and tax it. In the article is says: "There might be wakaresaseya agents operating without licences and in the shadows", implying it's regulated. Maybe you have to pass an exam to be an wakaresaseya!