4 ms·

You know Washington freed his slaves in his will, (when that was very uncommon) right?

• x86_64Ubuntu 6y ago
  Washington had no problem sending slave catchers after blacks who dared for their freedom. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hercules_Posey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hercules_Posey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oney_Judge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oney_Judge And he had no biological heirs which I can only imagine made it a breeze to not keep people in bondage.
  • true_religion 6y ago
    You are thinking of this from the point of view of a morally sound individual in the modern world. It is always difficult to simply destroy your wealth after death. It would have been easier for him to Will all his slaves to whomever inherited the rest of his estate, or to simply sell them all before his death and give that money to causes he believed in (like setting up a university under his name). No one at his time was going to criticize him. Heck other slave owners probably considered him too tender hearted for doing, what was in their minds the equivalent of releasing your prize horses into the wild to “run free” after you died.
• pmachinery 6y ago
  You know Apartheid South Africa freed Nelson Mandela? Indoctrination North Korea would kill for, never mind China: George Washington "freed slaves". Aside from owning (more than 300) human slaves, George Washington "yanked" the teeth from their heads for his own personal use[0], and he doesn't get enough credit for not doing that any more after he died either. [0] https://www.phillytrib.com/commentary/coard-george-washington-s-teeth-not-from-wood-but-slaves/article_f9f31911-bcdc-53ac-b86d-26aba781824d.html https://www.phillytrib.com/commentary/coard-george-washingto...