> nothing in "investigative reporting, [..]" is, what I consider news. q.e.d. At this point I don't think there's anything I can say that will convince you. B

> nothing in "investigative reporting, [..]" is, what I consider news. q.e.d. At this point I don't think there's anything I can say that will convince you. But yes, if you invent some contrived definition of "news site" that disqualifies every left-wing site, only right-wing ones remain. And I don't understand how that is even relevant to the article - as long as you can "get your news" from some source, that's enough. It doesn't have to pass some made-up purity test of what qualifies as a news site, because readers won't be applying that test. To pretend only right-wing sites share news and opinion for free is just willful blindness.