Although the overall idea of this article makes sense but there are certain fallacies that stand out. For example, the Times article on "neo-Nazis infiltrating

Although the overall idea of this article makes sense but there are certain fallacies that stand out. For example, the Times article on "neo-Nazis infiltrating German institutions" might not be "free" but the same article on New York Times was free. Does this imply that Times article must be closer to truth than the one in the New York Times? This assumption seems flawed.