>Banks may not directly use race as a criteria, but the claim is that they use race as a criteria for property value, and then use property value as a criteria

>Banks may not directly use race as a criteria, but the claim is that they use race as a criteria for property value, and then use property value as a criteria for loans ... You have to do the leg-work to show that Banks have a policy that is in intent racist because every policy you can ever think of will have a differential impact on any group you create - because groups will never be perfectly uniform. >Counting a building with active tenants paying rent as being valued at $0 is ridiculous. Not necessarily. This is why these articles are so terrible. They didn't do investigative journalism. They didn't do the legwork. I can tell you right now, there is a reason why it is valued at $0 - we just didn't get that reason because the journalist is lazy.