> At what point in the process > > instead of turning in code for review I.e. something like instead of turning in code example they turn in a motivated analy

> At what point in the process > > instead of turning in code for review I.e. something like instead of turning in code example they turn in a motivated analysis of why the scaffolding provided cannot support "proper" (and then analysis of so called proper) implementation of the thing asked, provide analysis for changes required in the scaffolding. Basically, the candidate would turn "provide and review code" process into "let's talk about architecture, implementation and tradeoffs". Would you discard such a candidate for not following the process because you expect seniority or would higher level thinking be a plus?