3 ms·
I can't go into a long list of ways to attack the various systems. But if you go above, I link to two different stories. Mail in voting is just much easier to h
by xhkkffbf 6y ago
I can't go into a long list of ways to attack the various systems. But if you go above, I link to two different stories. Mail in voting is just much easier to hack.
- specialist 6y agoThose two links do not imply what you think they imply. Those are problems with registrations, not ballots. If you truly consider problems with the VRDBs a high priority, then advocate for nationwide automatic universal voter registration, like every other mature democracy has done, thereby eliminating the problem. Further, I really do think you should compile an exhaustive list of all the problems and attack vectors you've found. Start by comparing and contrasting the procedures from misc jurisdictions. Observe some elections. Attend all the canvassing board meetings for an entire election cycle. Interview election administrators. Etc. What you learn may surprise you.
- xhkkffbf 6y agoBut they do. It's still fraud on the system. If you require people to go in person, there's only so much time in the day. Election workers will recognize them returning to vote with a different name. Those limitations don't affect mail in fraudsters.
- specialist 6y agoYa. I encourage you to learn how real world election administration is done. Ballot stuffing just isn't possible with the procedures used in King County and thru out Washington State. With poll sites, everyone had to sign in a poll book to receive a ballot. With postal ballots, they use ballot tracking and reconciliation reports. So. There are many valid election integrity criticisms. You haven't mentioned any of them yet.