4 ms·
I think I was among the first to test http://bushi.do http://bushi.do out with http://github.com/SingAlong/billmebob http://github.com/SingAlong/billmebob It's
by SingAlong 16y ago
I think I was among the first to test http://bushi.do http://bushi.do out with http://github.com/SingAlong/billmebob http://github.com/SingAlong/billmebob It's a really cool idea for a platform.
This is even better than Heroku. This, if done right, will probably change the way SaaS apps are done. It's the way the web's app store should work. Let people develop apps and let customers host the app, while these two parties never have to care about the hosting for the app (Bushi.do takes care of it. No meddling with config. All done by Bushi.do).
- nkohari 16y agoI don't know about others, but I don't think I'd be comfortable outsourcing my infrastructure to someone else to quite this degree. It's sort of like running a restaurant, but instead of having a kitchen, you go to your customers' houses and cook for them. That being said, this is awesome technology, and it's fantastic for open source projects. I just don't think it will revolutionize delivery of commercial SaaS apps.
- SingAlong 16y agoIt's sort of like running a restaurant, but instead of having a kitchen, you go to your customers' houses and cook for them. I would say it's like being an expert chef and passing on your recipe to a cook who can make the meal in his kitchen and deliver it to the customer. In this case. You, the developer, are the expert chef, Bushi.do is the cook who does the work for the customers. IMO, this turns the web like the mobile's app store/market. There's no investment for the developer apart from developing the app (for most apps). He can just put up the git url on Bushi.do. Any customer who's interested in the app can install it on Bushi.do and pay for the resources while you, the chef, gets a cut of it.