3 ms·
Seems to me like there should be a DHT way to solve this. When you boot up, you take your place in the table and query your neighbors for messages. If someone's
by myself248 6y ago
Seems to me like there should be a DHT way to solve this. When you boot up, you take your place in the table and query your neighbors for messages. If someone's unreachable when a message is sent, you hand the message to their neighbors to hold it until they appear.
- untog 6y agoWhich requires you to trust your neighbours. To which you might say: aha! Just use end to end encryption! And sure, you can. But at that point, what benefits are you getting over using E2E with a centralised system? Very few. And you’re getting a bunch of drawbacks in terms of reliability too.
- myself248 6y agoI dunno, a centralized server means a centralized off-switch, that's a pretty huge drawback in terms of reliability.
- afiori 6y agowhich is why centralized/peer-to-peer is a false dichotomy the solution to many of the problems of both of them is (forkable) federated networks
- maqp 6y agoE2EE only protects content. Metadata is also very important and where as p2p apps like Briar, Ricochet, Cwtch and TFC hide it from all, centralized and decentralized apps have one or more weak points that allow eavesdropping on larger amounts of metadata.