2 ms·
> if it were working with ArrayBuffers directly you would be so far away from usual JS and any convenience JS offers, you might as well not be writing JS Or yo
by spion 6y ago
> if it were working with ArrayBuffers directly you would be so far away from usual JS and any convenience JS offers, you might as well not be writing JS
Or you might as well do, since it makes interop generally easy. In the library space I no longer have to worry where my web code begins, where my mobile code ends or where my backend code sits. All libraries can be used anywhere I feel necessary with zero interop pain.
The same arugment was applied to writing C in the late 70s (vs writing several types of assemblies for various types of hardware at the time)