This case is so full of pot calling kettle back, it's amusing. Not to detract from their claim, but cmon, at least use arguments that hold water. "Meanwhile,

This case is so full of pot calling kettle back, it's amusing. Not to detract from their claim, but cmon, at least use arguments that hold water. "Meanwhile, the expenses required to host and review these apps are in the tens of millions, not billions of dollars." As if the price a company charges for its product has to be tied strictly to the cost it incurs to make that product. Does Telegram follow the same rule in its business dealings? As in so many disputes, the parties will claim this is about principles and yada yada yada, "Apple/Google exercises monopoly control, etc. You can be guaranteed though, it's always just about the price and how the one party doesn't want to pay it, and the other party doesn't want to change it. Simple as that.