40 ms·
The underlying motivation here is to accomplish two things: 1. Destroy the viability of the post office as a business (a long running campaign) 2. Disenfranch
by skuhn 6y ago
The underlying motivation here is to accomplish two things:
1. Destroy the viability of the post office as a business (a long running campaign)
2. Disenfranchise voters (a relatively recent campaign)
Tens of thousands of people were disenfranchised during the primaries because their ballots were received too late, even if they were postmarked on time. [1]
Tax returns are considered to be submitted on the date of their postmark, but ballots are not. There seems to be an important disconnect here tied to the different incentives for the state.
Dropping ballots off at dropbox makes a lot of sense, but it won't work for everyone. The rules also vary and availability is often poorly communicated. Plus, most people won't expect to have a problem with their ballot being counted until they find out that it wasn't counted.
But the problem doesn't start with submitting your ballot. First you have to successfully register to vote-by-mail (some states require a form to be mailed in), and most importantly you have to actually receive your ballot in time. This also happened during the primaries, and so people had to go vote in person after all (or be disenfranchised). [2]
Lots of things we take for granted will stop working with a failed postal service, but voting is particularly key right now. It is the only path towards attempting to fix the issue at hand.
[1] https://www.npr.org/2020/07/13/889751095/signed-sealed-undelivered-thousands-of-mail-in-ballots-rejected-for-tardiness https://www.npr.org/2020/07/13/889751095/signed-sealed-undel...
[2] https://time.com/5874571/new-york-state-general-election/ https://time.com/5874571/new-york-state-general-election/
- augustt 6y ago> 2. Disenfranchise voters (a relatively recent campaign) Recent as in it started the instant the 15th amendment was passed.
- skuhn 6y agoI'm referring to disenfranchisement by way of disrupting the operation of the mail, which I don't think has been a major focus for quite that long. Jim Crow laws were much more effective means of disenfranchisement during Reconstruction.
- oehtXRwMkIs 6y agoJim Crow laws were after Reconstruction.
- joe-collins 6y agoThe USPS is, by definition within the US Constitution, not a business. It is an agency of the federal government. It has no intrinsic responsibility to be profitable, or even self-funding, any more so than the Department of Transportation or the Census Bureau or the military. All arguments and restrictions along those lines serve only the private businesses that would benefit from its de facto dissolution. Per the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postal_Reorganization_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postal_Reorganization_Act > The United States Postal Service shall be operated as a basic and fundamental service provided to the people by the Government of the United States, authorized by the Constitution, created by Act of Congress, and supported by the people. The Postal Service shall have as its basic function the obligation to provide postal services to bind the Nation together through the personal, educational, literary, and business correspondence of the people. It shall provide prompt, reliable, and efficient services to patrons in all areas and shall render postal services to all communities. The costs of establishing and maintaining the Postal Service shall not be apportioned to impair the overall value of such service to the people.