"Unity is a radical departure, but no less so than GNOME 3.0, which has wisely been pushed back until later this year." I was wondering where the article autho

"Unity is a radical departure, but no less so than GNOME 3.0, which has wisely been pushed back until later this year." I was wondering where the article author got this idea. It seems as if he must have fallen for an April fool's joke (http://www.gnome.org/press/releases/2011-04-gnome-3.0-rescheduled.html http://www.gnome.org/press/releases/2011-04-gnome-3.0-resche...). I compared Unity and Gnome Shell a couple of months ago. At that point there was no comparison; Unity felt like a hacked-together prototype, and Gnome Shell felt like a beta. That's a very short-term view of course.