2 ms·
Absolutely agree with you about needing a well defined scope and how that can reduce the chance of an overrun. Likewise, laying the hammer down simply because
by aasarava 18y ago
Absolutely agree with you about needing a well defined scope and how that can reduce the chance of an overrun. Likewise, laying the hammer down simply because an arbitrary deadline is on the calendar isn't good project management.
But I still argue that a good, reasonable deadline that everyone on the team has a say in setting acts as a commitment -- the team is saying, "yes, we agree to deliver a product in this timeframe." Once you've made that commitment, the deadline then acts as a forcing factor that drives everyone to prioritize the most important tasks.
- Tamerlin 18y agoAgreed -- that's what prevents the endless rounds of re-factoring, and keeps everyone focused on building a product, rather than drifting off on tangents. We're saying the same thing, here. :)