2 ms·
It’s worse than that, because overly aggressive defence of trademarks isn’t punished yet not defending it could theoretically cost a business their trademark, i
by laumars 6y ago
It’s worse than that, because overly aggressive defence of trademarks isn’t punished yet not defending it could theoretically cost a business their trademark, it skews the system so, for businesses, it’s more beneficial to be aggressive.
(I certainly wouldn’t want to be the person that said “their fine to use our trademark. We have nothing to worry about” only to unexpectedly end up losing the trademark)