3 ms·
> 1. Write you will; I thought this was a command! > 3. Force them to all come together to decrypt the will for fairness. This seems like a good recipe for e
by JadeNB 6y ago
> 1. Write you will;
I thought this was a command!
> 3. Force them to all come together to decrypt the will for fairness.
This seems like a good recipe for ensuring integrity of the will, but it's hard (for me) to see how it ensures, or even promotes, fairness.
(Also, compelling presence seems like a strange side effect: the sort of person who would skip the reading of a will might not be motivated to ensure the fairness or integrity of the will anyway, so requiring their presence to verify it seems counterproductive.)
- k_sze 6y ago"fairness" as in nobody can claim somebody else has tempered with the will. Note: thanks for spotting the typo. I corrected it.
- leshow 6y agoYou could just write your will and sign it with a known public key. I don't see any reason why you'd want to keep the will hidden, or require participation to read it