Now I understand why first-hand knowledge is better than reading summaries and commentaries. Every conversation revolves around a context, which when separated

Now I understand why first-hand knowledge is better than reading summaries and commentaries. Every conversation revolves around a context, which when separated and generalised distorts the entire thing. Anyone who wishes to understand the context should watch the segment from the podcast, there are timestamps under the video. It is as not as black and white as the article makes it out to be, in fact, I’ve a new found respect for Joe after watching that particular podcast.