The title doesn't need the exclamation mark. The author agrees with Rogan's statement from the get-go and then goes on to choose arguments - notably the a theo

The title doesn't need the exclamation mark. The author agrees with Rogan's statement from the get-go and then goes on to choose arguments - notably the a theorem on 'fake fitness' posited by one psychologist in a blog post - that support that statement. This is fine and valid in itself, but then the article simply becomes what it is: a personal opinion piece based on personal views and values that eschews any critical dissection of arguments on both sides of the aisle.