3 ms·
Would assume generalizations are bad to make here. Video Games have: - Thought me more English than I could ever learn in school especially TALKING (non-nativ
by kainer 6y ago
Would assume generalizations are bad to make here.
Video Games have:
- Thought me more English than I could ever learn in school especially TALKING (non-native)
- Started many projects for me that helped me later on from learning programming to analytical thinking and strategy
- Learn to work in teams and become part of a community, even though I still had the weekly sports activity and school etc also
- Got me into PC hardware and MS Windows with great detail to optimize my experience
- Made me "escape reality" without waking up with a broken bone somewhere next to the road
Guess there were many more points, some of which I maybe wouldn't attribute towards gaming but where indirectly affected by it.
But I can also see how other generations might have a different experience. You might no longer need to tinker with your OS and hardware to get a great performance.
Creating large spreadsheets to calculate game specific actions and derive decisions is also not needed for many games.
So I guess saying video games are bad is way too generic, as it is to say drinking is bad. Depending on the usage and what you get out of it.
I am more than happy to not have taken jiu-jitsu classes and I would also challenge if that had made it any better for me compared to gaming.
- formerly_proven 6y ago> So I guess saying video games are bad is way too generic That's not the argument being presented. No one is talking about people who play 10-30 hours per two weeks, which is not an unreasonable amount of time for a hobby. This is largely about people who spend 60, 70, 80, 90 or triple digits per two weeks in games.