4 ms·
The standards in question are preponderance of the evidence (civil) and beyond a reasonable doubt (criminal). The standard is never "any possible way" or "no po
by wl 6y ago
The standards in question are preponderance of the evidence (civil) and beyond a reasonable doubt (criminal). The standard is never "any possible way" or "no possible way."
So my response would be that at a certain point, a tiny possibility does not amount to reasonable doubt.
- supernova87a 6y agoMany people, especially when you have average people on a jury, are not very good at drawing lines where the certain % or probability equals less than a reasonable doubt.