4 ms·
I think that worst case looks worse than it was because it is ignoring dividends.
by ummonk 6y ago
I think that worst case looks worse than it was because it is ignoring dividends.
- hydroreadsstuff 6y agoGood point. I found this here: https://www.officialdata.org/us/stocks/s-p-500/1900 https://www.officialdata.org/us/stocks/s-p-500/1900 1929 - 1944 seems to be the worst.