3 ms·
I don't consider the 3.3.1 situation to be relevant, as in this case you would be running the official Apple toolchain. If you had brought up the section of th
by mambodog 16y ago
I don't consider the 3.3.1 situation to be relevant, as in this case you would be running the official Apple toolchain.
If you had brought up the section of the iOS Developer License Agreement relating to "non-Apple-branded hardware" you might be in the right ballpark, but the legality of a similar clause in the Mac OS EULA was cast into doubt in the Psystar case. Psystar aside, the (non-commercial) OSx86 scene continues to thrive, unhindered by Apple.
At the end of the day, given that you would be running the official Apple toolchain, how would Apple be able to prove that a particular iOS app was not built on a Mac?