5 ms·

Setting five police cars on fire is punk rock, not "domestic terrorism" Setting cars on fire is not an act of spreading terror. It is an act of defiance

• VWWHFSfQ 6y ago
  Your Honor, I firebombed those police cars because I'm PUNK ROCK! do you see how you sound
  • deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]
  • tomc1985 6y ago
    Again, you are misunderstanding the intention. 9/11 was an act of terrorism. Setting police cars on fire is vandalism, destruction of government property, maybe something for endangering police officers or something. All things condoned by your local friendly "anarchists". What it isn't is terrorism. Now go and listen to some Rage Against the Machine. Are they terrorists?
    • darkerside 6y ago
      Is lighting crosses on fire terrorism?
      • tomc1985 6y ago
        Yes, because the whole point of that act is to terrify whoever lives on the property of the cross you're burning
        • darkerside 6y ago
          Why are people lighting cop cars on fire? Please don't say it's to make an intelligent and nuanced political statement.
          • tomc1985 6y ago
            Because they want to destroy the government. Or their frustrated. Or mad. Or feeling mischevious. None of those things are terrorism
  • skinnymuch 6y ago
    Calling lighting some cars on fire terrorism sounds more frightening than anything else. I feel terrorized just by that.
    • blue52 6y ago
      Everything is "terrorism" these days if the gov't doesn't like the thought/action/person/group.