5 ms·

Stonehenge is also between 4 and 5 thousand years old but it's not going to tell you anything about the mystical traditions of the people of the British Isles.

by khuey 6y ago

justinzollars 6y ago
The difference between the West and China is that China has been able to maintain its civilization state and it has a continuous history. The West's history is discontinuous
- chillacy 6y ago
  I noticed that "maintaining civilizational state" is.. to be generous.. simply a state of narrative. The imperial system is definitely over, Xi wears a suit and tie and there are no legions of eunichs running the country. Though fun fact, Mussolini was pretty big on emphasizing the whole Italy == Rome deal. And in the US there's only maybe 300 years of serious history to cover so I recall my history class had to reach all the way back to Greece as an idealogical source of American democracy.
- divbzero 6y ago
  > China has been able to maintain its civilization state and it has a continuous history To check the validity of this statement while neutralizing my own bias, I watched the following video [1] which maps out China’s political borders year by year from 1600 BCE to 2017. Watching at 2x speed on mute took 4 minutes and was quite illuminating. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWqVzZnwnOk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWqVzZnwnOk "The History of China : Every Year"
  - divbzero 6y ago
    This one takes 10 minutes at 2x speed and provides a global perspective. [2] [2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6Wu0Q7x5D0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6Wu0Q7x5D0 "The History of the World: Every Year"
- peteretep 6y ago
  > China has been able to maintain its civilization state and it has a continuous history I'm baffled by what this means. Could you compare it to the United Kingdom for me? Are you conflating written history with continuous history?
  - yomly 6y ago
    While as an island the UK means its borders have mostly been fixed, it has definitely had quite a fluid culture and language history. The romans came and left their mark. Then the Vikings and the normans. We've had a strange love hate relationship with the French forever, branding them frogs while learning French so we can seem sophisticated. So in my mind it does lack that continuity that China has: For instance the sunzi bingfa (art of war) was written in 500BC and still is mostly understandable today. On the other hand if I were to drop a reference from Vergil or Homer in latin/greek. I would be branded of being in cahoots with Boris Johnson and very few people would understand it. Edit: And even that - I don't think Italians really would understand Latin texts (tho will have a better chance than brits). I think ancient greek is a little easier for modern greek speakers tho.
    - peteretep 6y ago
      This is excessively cherry-picked, and I’m just going to steal a quote from Wikipedia to illustrate: > The Chinese have different languages in different provinces, to such an extent that they cannot understand each other.... [They] also have another language which is like a universal and common language; this is the official language of the mandarins and of the court; it is among them like Latin among ourselves.... The idea that you could transplant a peasant between millennia in China or even over any significant distance, and have them remain intelligible is simply untrue. In addition, you could take an educated person in most of Europe in the last 2000 years and expect to be able to communicate with them in Latin — it’s only the last hundred years or so when this has fallen out of favour. So recently in fact that nobody raised an eyebrow about the fact I had mandatory Latin lessons from the age of ten at my school, in the 90s.
      - 6y ago
- CydeWeys 6y ago
  There have been plenty of rises and falls of civilization in China in the intervening thousands of years. It's way reductionist to claim that this is all the same one unflagging continuous empire. In a way, you're doing Chinese history a huge disservice by making it a lot less interesting than it actually is when you claim that it's all just one empire persisting steadily through time. And anyway, "the west" has a continuous history going all the way back through the ancient Greeks. That's at least two and a half millennia. It's not been the same people or the same empire since then, obviously (same for China), but the continuous written history easily goes back at least that far.
  - justinzollars 6y ago
    I think your perspective is one of not having read any books on China, not having studied anything about China and not having been to China.
    - CydeWeys 6y ago
      Do you have anything to contribute beyond ad hominem and argument from authority?

Stonehenge is also between 4 and 5 thousand years old but it's not going to tell you anything about the mystical traditions of the people of the British Isles.

by khuey 6y ago

Stonehenge is also between 4 and 5 thousand years old but it's not going to tell you anything about the mystical traditions of the people of the British Isles.

justinzollars 6y ago

The difference between the West and China is that China has been able to maintain its civilization state and it has a continuous history. The West's history is discontinuous

chillacy 6y ago
I noticed that "maintaining civilizational state" is.. to be generous.. simply a state of narrative. The imperial system is definitely over, Xi wears a suit and tie and there are no legions of eunichs running the country. Though fun fact, Mussolini was pretty big on emphasizing the whole Italy == Rome deal. And in the US there's only maybe 300 years of serious history to cover so I recall my history class had to reach all the way back to Greece as an idealogical source of American democracy.
divbzero 6y ago
> China has been able to maintain its civilization state and it has a continuous history To check the validity of this statement while neutralizing my own bias, I watched the following video [1] which maps out China’s political borders year by year from 1600 BCE to 2017. Watching at 2x speed on mute took 4 minutes and was quite illuminating. [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWqVzZnwnOk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWqVzZnwnOk "The History of China : Every Year"
- divbzero 6y ago
  This one takes 10 minutes at 2x speed and provides a global perspective. [2] [2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6Wu0Q7x5D0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6Wu0Q7x5D0 "The History of the World: Every Year"
peteretep 6y ago
> China has been able to maintain its civilization state and it has a continuous history I'm baffled by what this means. Could you compare it to the United Kingdom for me? Are you conflating written history with continuous history?
- yomly 6y ago
  While as an island the UK means its borders have mostly been fixed, it has definitely had quite a fluid culture and language history. The romans came and left their mark. Then the Vikings and the normans. We've had a strange love hate relationship with the French forever, branding them frogs while learning French so we can seem sophisticated. So in my mind it does lack that continuity that China has: For instance the sunzi bingfa (art of war) was written in 500BC and still is mostly understandable today. On the other hand if I were to drop a reference from Vergil or Homer in latin/greek. I would be branded of being in cahoots with Boris Johnson and very few people would understand it. Edit: And even that - I don't think Italians really would understand Latin texts (tho will have a better chance than brits). I think ancient greek is a little easier for modern greek speakers tho.
  - peteretep 6y ago
    This is excessively cherry-picked, and I’m just going to steal a quote from Wikipedia to illustrate: > The Chinese have different languages in different provinces, to such an extent that they cannot understand each other.... [They] also have another language which is like a universal and common language; this is the official language of the mandarins and of the court; it is among them like Latin among ourselves.... The idea that you could transplant a peasant between millennia in China or even over any significant distance, and have them remain intelligible is simply untrue. In addition, you could take an educated person in most of Europe in the last 2000 years and expect to be able to communicate with them in Latin — it’s only the last hundred years or so when this has fallen out of favour. So recently in fact that nobody raised an eyebrow about the fact I had mandatory Latin lessons from the age of ten at my school, in the 90s.
    - 6y ago
CydeWeys 6y ago
There have been plenty of rises and falls of civilization in China in the intervening thousands of years. It's way reductionist to claim that this is all the same one unflagging continuous empire. In a way, you're doing Chinese history a huge disservice by making it a lot less interesting than it actually is when you claim that it's all just one empire persisting steadily through time. And anyway, "the west" has a continuous history going all the way back through the ancient Greeks. That's at least two and a half millennia. It's not been the same people or the same empire since then, obviously (same for China), but the continuous written history easily goes back at least that far.
- justinzollars 6y ago
  I think your perspective is one of not having read any books on China, not having studied anything about China and not having been to China.
  - CydeWeys 6y ago
    Do you have anything to contribute beyond ad hominem and argument from authority?