4 ms·
> I don't think the federal government or at least the executive should have that kind of authority like asking/forcing Microsoft to do a specific thing. No yo
by jjcon 6y ago
> I don't think the federal government or at least the executive should have that kind of authority like asking/forcing Microsoft to do a specific thing.
No you misunderstand - Read the article, TikTok would sell off to keep operating in the US (just like Amazon had to sell off data centers to operate them in the EU). The US government wouldn’t be forcing Microsoft, just saying if you want to operate with American data you have to be on American soil.
> Anyways such straight reciprocal actions are often the naivest, and most simplistic of possible responses anyway
But you haven’t offered an alternative. They should respond, I don’t think this is an unreasonable way to do it.
- billfruit 6y agoI am not sure this is even a response to anything. It looks like the first US move in a new confrontation with China. Merely treating is as a response, isn't sufficiently strong explanation in my opinion. More over I don't think President has power/authority to ban anything at all, let alone apps on privately administered app stores. President isn't a dictator elected by the people. There might be legitimate grounds to take action against an app/service like data breaches or copyright infringement, even terms of right violations, but nothing of that seems to be the case. Even if it was the case, it would have to go through the legal justice system. From what I have seen, the theory of threats to national security being bandied about isn't substantial nor concrete enough to hold in courts. So if TikTok does not run afoul of our laws, there shouldn't be grounds for banning that or any other app citing vague and theoretical national security considerations.
- mvc 6y ago> just like Amazon had to sell off data centers to operate them in the EU You're saying amazon don't own their EU data centers? That's surprising to me. Got a source for that?