3 ms·
> But grades aren't important for success, they're important for opportunity. A fair distinction, yes. > The student with lower grades may lose out on some op
by ecdavis 6y ago
> But grades aren't important for success, they're important for opportunity.
A fair distinction, yes.
> The student with lower grades may lose out on some opportunities, or only get access to them later, but if they've gained better understanding (while a student) of the material, they'll be better off in the long run than the person acing every test and homework, primarily by cramming and forgetting in a week.
I'd like to believe this, but I don't think it's true. Prestige, connections, and opportunity costs are too significant to ignore.
> Once you get a job, your grades barely matter anymore. And after several positions and a few years in the field, no one is likely to ask for your transcript.
True, but at a large enough company you'll participate in a performance review system in which you'll regularly be given a literal grade which influences your career trajectory. Goodhart's law comes into effect again.
- unishark 6y agoGoodhart's law comes in because students who do not deserve good grades still can get them via other means besides than the professor intended. Hence grades become less trustworthy (they might lack understanding but "hacked" their way through via cramming etc). However understanding the material also leads to good grades. It's not like there's a trade-off there where students must choose one and thereby lose the other.