4 ms·
Here's an estimate of ARM's revenue per chip at 10 cents (profit maybe half that). [1]https://qz.com/741078/a-company-that-doesnt-really-make-chips-dethroned-i
by jmchuster 6y ago
Here's an estimate of ARM's revenue per chip at 10 cents (profit maybe half that).
[1]https://qz.com/741078/a-company-that-doesnt-really-make-chips-dethroned-intel-with-super-savvy-business-moves/ https://qz.com/741078/a-company-that-doesnt-really-make-chip...
Here's an estimate of youtube (not exactly tiktok, but not exactly not), revenue at 10 to 30 cents per view.
[2]https://influencermarketinghub.com/how-much-do-youtubers-make/ https://influencermarketinghub.com/how-much-do-youtubers-mak...
- jmchuster 6y agoSorry, this is wrong by an order of magnitude. Youtube is making more like 1-3 cents per view.
- nintendo1889 6y agothat article makes me wonder if the beos would have survived if they switched from Hobbit to arm chips and stuck with selling hardware+software, and later on added x86/x64/PPC/POWER. A tight integration of hw+sw has worked for apple.
- mumblemumble 6y agoMy guess is no. I loved BeOS, but there was an even more fundamental problem that put a limit on its days: A failure to anticipate coming need for home computers to become more secure. At the same time that Microsoft and Apple were both working frantically to ditch their old single-user desktop operating systems and replace them with, in effect, spruced up versions of existing server/workstation operating systems, Be was trying to launch a brand new OS on the dying model. Had they survived even a couple years longer, they would have had to reckon with that, and they simply didn't have the resources to navigate such a fundamental transition.