3 ms·
> And I imply to agree with labeling Apple a monopoly precisely because, unlike the gas station on your example, a iPhone user cannot drive 3 miles to buy Spoti
by nodamage 6y ago
> And I imply to agree with labeling Apple a monopoly precisely because, unlike the gas station on your example, a iPhone user cannot drive 3 miles to buy Spotify without having to pay Apple's 30% fee.
They can choose a non-Apple phone. There is an alternative product on the market.
- 627467 6y agoThat is not what the case is about. The case is about Spotify not having fair access to Apple customers.
- nodamage 6y agoSpotify is no more entitled to Apple's customers than Nike is entitled to Walmart's customers. If Nike wants to sell shoes in Walmart they will have to accept Walmarts terms, or find another store to sell in.