3 ms·
Just for fun, I made a comparison with the data from Google Trends: http://i.imgur.com/T1H1C.png http://i.imgur.com/T1H1C.png Google is actually pretty close,
by chaosmachine 16y ago
Just for fun, I made a comparison with the data from Google Trends:
http://i.imgur.com/T1H1C.png http://i.imgur.com/T1H1C.png
Google is actually pretty close, although the last few months are off.
- GDH 16y agoI was just doing the same thing, you beat me to it. Thanks for the comparison, it's interesting to see how analytics from others compare to the real thing.
- Swannie 16y agoThanks, now I don't need to do that to satisfy my curiosity :-)
- bemmu 16y agoHere's (updated) Alexa: http://i.imgur.com/Tw8mh.png http://i.imgur.com/Tw8mh.png According to alexa "daily reach", traffic from Mar 2009 to Mar 2011 went from reach ~0.0137 to reach ~0.104, so I scaled the Alexa graph to show ~7.9x more absolute uniques in the end than in the beginning.
- travisglines 16y agoThanks for the comparison, I'm actually very impressed by the accuracy of Google trends. I wonder given the lack of accuracy between quantcast/alexa/compete if there is room in the market for another traffic intelligence site that piggybacks off of Google trends somehow. [Edit] Looks like its against their TOS: http://groups.google.com/group/google-labs-trends/browse_thread/thread/91a9b8743314ba79/ae79c5e7505f6e03 http://groups.google.com/group/google-labs-trends/browse_thr... Hmm...