>No, not quite. They/we want the same kind of justice so our fundamental expectations or rights preserved -- and if that does not suit copyright, then it is cop

>No, not quite. They/we want the same kind of justice so our fundamental expectations or rights preserved -- and if that does not suit copyright, then it is copyright that must give way. it is somewhat false dichotomy - the copyright itself has no conflict with the fundamental rights. It is the modern way of enforcing the copyright on the Internet and investigating/prosecuting the copyright violations there that is violating fundamental rights. Somehow due process gets relaxed when it comes to copyright violations. Though may be the strength of the due process was only perceived as such if one considers all these cases when an Afro wearing guy would get arrested a week later and get a life (or even death) for the crime committed by a bald perpetrator. 30+ year ago society felt that these guys weren't worth the due process and looks like today the society thinks that "the ones who copy from the Internet or the ones who have something to hide" aren't worth the due process.