If you have 20,000 people in the city, and 200,000 people outside and you kick out the 20,000 people in the city, to another state so 20,000 suburbans move in

If you have 20,000 people in the city, and 200,000 people outside and you kick out the 20,000 people in the city, to another state so 20,000 suburbans move into the city now you have 20,000 people in the city, and 180,000 people outside I'm not sure what you've solved. It feels like you're arguing this is a knee-jerk reaction, and a fair reaction, and that this is a solution, but you keep avoiding saying how it actually solves anything regarding overcrowding. Like it solves every problem except the one under discussion.