3 ms·
> the pattern is, some news about Apple comes out, people rage BEFORE getting the entire story, then later learn the truth and calm down I found it credible. I
by oarsinsync 6y ago
> the pattern is, some news about Apple comes out, people rage BEFORE getting the entire story, then later learn the truth and calm down
I found it credible. I upvoted the post. I then learnt the truth, and posted that I found the original tweet credible.
There's no rage. There's just me, a long time Apple customer, finding a falsehood believable.
There's more nuance to the world than just 'Apple haters' and 'rage'. You don't have to be an 'Apple hater' to fall for this. You don't have to have been 'raging' to have fallen for this. You can just be (like me) stupid, and happily admit that.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- tekknik 6y agoWell next time perhaps look a little deeper. It was pretty obvious to me the poster doesn’t know much about this process. This would’ve come up years ago, this should’ve been a red flag to anybody believing it. But hey, people miss facts all the time. However the specific problem here is why this person didn’t get the facts prior to posting. With how quickly people react to fake news is dangerous these days. So maybe do yourself a favor and play devils advocate next time. Also scroll down in this comments section to find your ragers.