19 ms·
It's not a bad idea, the timing isn't right, I see GPT as being ~13-14 years ahead of its time. I'm pretty certain within our lifetime we will see an explosion
by surajs 6y ago
It's not a bad idea, the timing isn't right, I see GPT as being ~13-14 years ahead of its time. I'm pretty certain within our lifetime we will see an explosion of such tools, now with CSS and browser engines being significantly less intelligent than their future counterparts, GPT-3 WILL/ might just evolve into something substantial, hence the buzz
- theptip 6y ago> I see GPT as being ~13-14 years ahead of its time. What do you think is missing from GPT that will take more than ten years to add?
- petters 6y agoI certainly would not want to bet on it, but adding the ability to perform computation and access storage could take 10 years. Right now, GPT-3 "sees" 2048 tokens, does a forward pass, and outputs the next word. We would like to to be able to say "hold on while I think for a while" but how to do that with current gradient-based deep learning methods is unclear.