I don't know what your stance is and I don't know the book's stance is. All I know is what the synopsis and the comments state its primary arguments are - that

I don't know what your stance is and I don't know the book's stance is. All I know is what the synopsis and the comments state its primary arguments are - that religion is the cause of trouble with scientific literacy of the US public. Beyond that I have made no comments, but I see a lot of downvoting and feather ruffling in response to simple statement of facts. I did show with a link that the premise of the argument, that there is trouble with scientific literacy in the US, is questionable. I responded to the question "where did you get that idea" and was downvoted when I answered the question. I find that interesting.