> It's not that they're giving paid content away for free, it's that they're extracting copyrighted content and profiting from it (without compensating the copy

> It's not that they're giving paid content away for free, it's that they're extracting copyrighted content and profiting from it (without compensating the copyright holder). Wouldn't that imply that they simply have to pay to be displayed as it would be advertisement? Ergo they will get removed and not get any advertisement anymore as a result.