The idea behind the post was interesting at first. Unfortunately, I think you try to cover way too much. And in covering so much you fail to develop the connect

The idea behind the post was interesting at first. Unfortunately, I think you try to cover way too much. And in covering so much you fail to develop the connection between the two histories you discuss. Finally, to the end of the post is a jumble of semi-related ideas that are poorly connected. I would suggest something like this to make it more readable: -Intro -History of Publishing -How ^ relates to history of journalism -History of journalism -How both histories shape the present state -Your ideas about the future That seems pretty ambitious for a blog post though.