> C++ instead of go to get even that extra performance out Might as well use C then (with some hand-written asm sprinkled in where the compiler gets confused a

> C++ instead of go to get even that extra performance out Might as well use C then (with some hand-written asm sprinkled in where the compiler gets confused and doesn't see an obvious optimization) for that. And I'm not even being sarcastic here (I wish I was though)