4 ms·
That is a much, much higher standard than TechCrunch itself seems to use. On one hand you claim inaccuracies are "2%" and acceptable, and that a few phone call
by aristus 16y ago
That is a much, much higher standard than TechCrunch itself seems to use.
On one hand you claim inaccuracies are "2%" and acceptable, and that a few phone calls is enough research before going to press. On the other hand you demand a 6-point research project before someone can even begin to criticize TC in turn.
Where is your six-point research project backing up why "his own post is complete shit"? I have no opinion either way -- but I believe you're applying very different standards of proof.
- nikcub 16y agohis post was a poor personal attack with zero effort to back up any claims. I outlined one of the ways it could have been a better post.