7 ms·
Can GPT-3 make a valid point? Good writers have something to say, and they don't waste words saying it. Someone just good with language is an editor. Or a bab
by unabst 6y ago
Can GPT-3 make a valid point?
Good writers have something to say, and they don't waste words saying it.
Someone just good with language is an editor. Or a babbler. Or a rapper.
- NaNtales 6y agoSome of the most talented and pertinent writers of our time are rappers. I would encourage you not to dismiss them so readily.
- unabst 6y agoYes. But they are also good writers, no? After the premise that good writers have something to say, it should be clear I am referring to the "just rapper" rapper.
- splatzone 6y agoHow do you feel about poets?
- unabst 6y agoA good poet has something to say, and wastes no words saying it.
- manjalyc 6y agoWell that seems awfully close minded. “Good writers” are those who can engage their audience, your perspective of a “Good writer” is simply a reflection of you as a target audience. No need to put everyone in your box.
- unabst 6y agoHow do you engage your audience without giving them anything? With just word play? And are we all forgetting the context of GPT-3 and the post I was replying to? Also Jay-Z isn't every rapper. I'm pretty sure even Jay-Z would agree most rap is not very substantive or saying anything new. It's cookie cutter.
- manjalyc 6y agoI do believe you, in this exact order, missed my point and then proved it...
- unabst 6y agoSo your point is most cookie cutter rap is good writing? If engagement is the new measure of good writing, then we are lost. Click bait is engagement. Tabloid material is engagement. Fox vs CNN and political trigger pieces are all engagement. None of it should be considered good writing.