> what's written is mostly bullshit. This is very upsetting to some. But not George Carlin or Ludwig Wittgenstein. > "How-to" material [...] It lacks adequate

> what's written is mostly bullshit. This is very upsetting to some. But not George Carlin or Ludwig Wittgenstein. > "How-to" material [...] It lacks adequate ties to the real world. And so did we. How-to is science. Until we figured out how to align statements with external evidence, we lacked ties to the real world. Once we began aligning statements and then translating those statements into mathematics, we made it to the moon and in quite a short time. > The shape of that space is a big unsolved problem in AI. GTP-3 isn't a scientist. It doesn't make observations that it can axiomatize as new true premises for further processing. Anecdotally, neither do most of us!