3 ms·

Here's an example, right on Google's Play store: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.loan.cash.credit.branch.tala.fast.lending.mexico&hl=en_US htt

Here's an example, right on Google's Play store: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.loan.cash.credit.branch.tala.fast.lending.mexico&hl=en_US https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.loan.cash.... Translating their "example" scenario: > For example, for a loan of $1,000 to pay in 91 days, you will have to pay only $82 of interest, a commission of $180 and VAT (16%). The total amount to be paid would be $1,384. CAT: 151.1%, annual interest rate: 21.9%. You get $1000, then three months later you pay it back plus 38%. Sounds legit /s Hiring post linking Okredito to Opera: https://www.simplyhired.mx/search?q=cobranza+preventiva&l=benito+ju%C3%A1rez%2C+cdmx&job=AfGTaw91kEmdHRB1fuk0mN5SDwtqfrG9AAQaoOJUKZmNSkebsYwRGw https://www.simplyhired.mx/search?q=cobranza+preventiva&l=be...

pawelmi 6y ago
To customer belonging to high risk group (which would be main customers of lending apps) banks simply refuse to even start conversation about credit. But then it is not called predatory. Pretty clean solution. Since banks take customers with low default probability, here risk has to be unfortunately priced in. Load that is not repaid is not only revenue loss, it is also loss of capital (that company is obliged to protect) as there are really slim chances/high price to recollect. It is not fair that usually the poorest pay the price, but the whole system is not fair. And I believe that it is actually financial apps that have some chance to democratize it more. I do not know about Mexico, but such businesses are usually also regulated, wich is good, because at one end market knows the local conditions like capital cost and risk and at the other they do not fall into usury. In your example: the bank lending rate in MX is already more than twice than US. Later, if you assume that for new unknown customer the delinquency probability cost has to be fixed in the price, then annualising the rate of short term loan makes it really scary. Such companies usually have better rates for returning customers.
- OrangeKnucles 6y ago
  Road to hell is paved with good intentions. Most people who want to stop 'exploitation' of poor people by corporations would never take a single step to help them.

pawelmi 6y ago

To customer belonging to high risk group (which would be main customers of lending apps) banks simply refuse to even start conversation about credit. But then it is not called predatory. Pretty clean solution. Since banks take customers with low default probability, here risk has to be unfortunately priced in. Load that is not repaid is not only revenue loss, it is also loss of capital (that company is obliged to protect) as there are really slim chances/high price to recollect. It is not fair that usually the poorest pay the price, but the whole system is not fair. And I believe that it is actually financial apps that have some chance to democratize it more. I do not know about Mexico, but such businesses are usually also regulated, wich is good, because at one end market knows the local conditions like capital cost and risk and at the other they do not fall into usury. In your example: the bank lending rate in MX is already more than twice than US. Later, if you assume that for new unknown customer the delinquency probability cost has to be fixed in the price, then annualising the rate of short term loan makes it really scary. Such companies usually have better rates for returning customers.

OrangeKnucles 6y ago
Road to hell is paved with good intentions. Most people who want to stop 'exploitation' of poor people by corporations would never take a single step to help them.