4 ms·
Can you give an example of your train trips that are shorter than the flights. It seems like a short flight between SFO-LAX is about ~1.5 hours of sitting-insid
by shreyansj 6y ago
Can you give an example of your train trips that are shorter than the flights. It seems like a short flight between SFO-LAX is about ~1.5 hours of sitting-inside-the-tube. I am not aware of a train between these two cities that can do this trip in any significantly less time than that.
- peacefulhat 6y agothe parent comment is that we should build highspeed trains like the ones in other countries that demolish plane travel time and overall checkin to destination time.
- xvilka 6y agoBuilding high-speed train track would provide exactly that, something like Shinkansen or CRH trains.
- devonkim 6y agoWasn't sure which were the apples and oranges to even begin comparing it seems. I was thinking of train trips locally like commuter trains for about 30 - 40 miles v. short flights a state away because for a train trip to be made a route needs to exist, and those tend to be commuter trains. I wouldn't suggest a train to be an aggregately shorter time period for a long distance trip. Another factor to consider is that total time for air travel for the covid context should include sitting on a tarmac and loading / unloading.
- yongjik 6y agoOne thing to consider is that train seats are significantly roomier and more comfortable than airline economy seats. This site[1] lists most high-speed trains having seat pitch of >900mm (or 35in), some reaching 1,000mm (39in). According to [2] most airlines have seat pitch of 31-32 in. [1] https://misc.transport.rail.europe.narkive.com/ffTnAi0D/seat-pitch-on-high-speed-trains https://misc.transport.rail.europe.narkive.com/ffTnAi0D/seat... [2] https://www.seatguru.com/charts/longhaul_economy.php https://www.seatguru.com/charts/longhaul_economy.php
- m0zg 6y ago6 feet is 72 inches though. So this is insufficient.