4 ms·
I'm not saying it was factually correct or internally consistent, just that it's miles ahead of any computer-generated text I've seen elsewhere.
by l0b0 6y ago
I'm not saying it was factually correct or internally consistent, just that it's miles ahead of any computer-generated text I've seen elsewhere.
- robertk 6y agoReally? I thought it was in the same class as this one: https://amp.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/hmu5lm/fiction_by_neil_gaiman_and_terry_pratchett_by_gpt3/ https://amp.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/hmu5lm/fict... As well as multiple examples given by gwern.
- bdamm 6y agoIt's certainly miles ahead of where I thought we were at. Today's GPT-3 discussion (in this thread and elsewhere) have really opened up my concept of what is possible today. And I'm starting to wonder how many news articles are just basically GPT-3. Or really, how many people are earning good money doing less work than GTP-3 could do in an instant.
- cortesoft 6y agoThis is why everyone is talking about GPT-3