4 ms·
The article references made up history like “GPT-1 by DeepMind” or “Global Data Net.” It is clearly confabulated and contains multiple non-sensical contradictio
by robertk 6y ago
The article references made up history like “GPT-1 by DeepMind” or “Global Data Net.” It is clearly confabulated and contains multiple non-sensical contradictions to the astute observer. I’m not surprised if it was output by GPT-3. A more lengthy response to your reaction is here: https://www.google.com/amp/s/srconstantin.wordpress.com/2019/02/25/humans-who-are-not-concentrating-are-not-general-intelligences/amp/ https://www.google.com/amp/s/srconstantin.wordpress.com/2019...
- l0b0 6y agoI'm not saying it was factually correct or internally consistent, just that it's miles ahead of any computer-generated text I've seen elsewhere.
- robertk 6y agoReally? I thought it was in the same class as this one: https://amp.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/hmu5lm/fiction_by_neil_gaiman_and_terry_pratchett_by_gpt3/ https://amp.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/hmu5lm/fict... As well as multiple examples given by gwern.
- bdamm 6y agoIt's certainly miles ahead of where I thought we were at. Today's GPT-3 discussion (in this thread and elsewhere) have really opened up my concept of what is possible today. And I'm starting to wonder how many news articles are just basically GPT-3. Or really, how many people are earning good money doing less work than GTP-3 could do in an instant.
- cortesoft 6y agoThis is why everyone is talking about GPT-3