I would love the idea (for data-driven science) of a peer review before execution of the work. Write up a one- or 2-pager, review methodology and accept/reject

I would love the idea (for data-driven science) of a peer review before execution of the work. Write up a one- or 2-pager, review methodology and accept/reject based on that. Once the work has been done, there would mostly be editorial comments. Of course, that ignores the analysis section, which is somewhat important. But still, a vast improvement over today's way, where you may end up spending a lot of time only to get a vague reject.