> That would have been worth the expense in DBA time alone, right? You're assuming the DBA did nothing else during the project's timeline, and that's not likel

> That would have been worth the expense in DBA time alone, right? You're assuming the DBA did nothing else during the project's timeline, and that's not likely the case. A lot of work in projects like this is just letting the batch job run while you keep an eye on it.