3 ms·
If the only charge is that haskell consulting companies are writing code for cryptocurrency projects, then I have misunderstood the article first time around. I
by bondarchuk 6y ago
If the only charge is that haskell consulting companies are writing code for cryptocurrency projects, then I have misunderstood the article first time around. I assumed the problem was with developments in the haskell language itself.
- the_af 6y agoExactly this. The article is not about the Haskell language itself -- i.e. not a rant about technical issues -- but about its community and consulting companies getting (allegedly) entangled with crypto businesses. "Making a deal with the devil". That's why the author rants about crypto and not about Haskell itself.
- sanxiyn 6y agoI am not sure what is "alleged" about Haskell consultancies getting cryptocurrency money. It is pretty easy to confirm. Both Well-Typed and FP Complete got money from Cardano and posted to their blog what amount to advertisements for Cardano. Google a bit if you care.
- the_af 6y ago"Alleged" as in "the article claims this, but I personally haven't double-checked it so don't want to make my post sound as I myself were sure this was the case". "Alleged" doesn't mean "unfounded". I've written enough comments on HN to know that if I don't word it this way, someone will inevitably start arguing with me as if the assertion was mine.
- mcguire 6y ago"...posted to their blog what amount to advertisements for Cardano." And that would seem to be exactly what Stephen is complaining about.
- sanxiyn 6y agoIt does affect Haskell language itself (GHC anyway). See moomin's comment.