4 ms·
For 20% of the cloud spend as the price , would expect a far more detailed view of what features to expect from the subscription. While it is a interesting conc
by weekay 6y ago
For 20% of the cloud spend as the price , would expect a far more detailed view of what features to expect from the subscription. While it is a interesting concept , not sure if the features would entice anyone to part with 20% of the clod spend for what can be setup initially.
- have_faith 6y agoFeels like an odd pricing model to me but I'm not the target audience so not sure what would be expected. I don't want my cost to Revolv to be so unpredictable. If my AWS costs go up Revolv just keeps charging me more?
- jeremylevy 6y agoThanks! We'll add more details. The price part is something we’ve been thinking about for a while. There are many possibilities: - Taking a fee as a percentage of your cloud provider bill for each architecture - A free plan for the architectures created without the user-friendly features and a premium one? - A monthly subscription? Per developer? Per architecture? What do you think?
- rimjongun 6y agoCheck out GruntCode (I think that’s the name) They do devops as a service. ~$8k a year to access their code, they’ll even help you tune it. Never used them.
- jrott 6y agoI really like the idea of this but having the pricing based off of cloud spend makes me nervous. Stuff that is launched should be in the most cost efficient way possible but if the fee is based off cloud spend there is an agent principle problem around that.