3 ms·
This is an overly simplistic view in my opinion. #1 assumes a strong relationship between the stock market and the overall economy which hasn't been true in re
by MrPowers 6y ago
This is an overly simplistic view in my opinion. #1 assumes a strong relationship between the stock market and the overall economy which hasn't been true in recent years (corporate profits are growing way faster than the economy). #2 assumes that the Fed printing money will decrease the value of the dollar, which it might, but in the last 10 years, the Fed has greatly increased the money supply and the dollar has strengthened a lot.
It's best to use terms like the Fed, the US government and US corporations rather than "the US". They're all different.
The possible scenarios investors see are much more varied and nuanced than the two options you've outlined.
- voidmain0001 6y agoFrom option 1, are corporate profits up because of expanded share buyback operations of those corporations? In the current economic downturn buyback-ing seems to be the way to show earnings to shareholders...
- MrPowers 6y agoI was referring to net corporate profits (revenue minus expenses) which aren't impacted by share buybacks. Share buybacks reduce the number of shares outstanding and increase the earnings per share, but don't impact net income.